Re: "No national historic status for Riverview," Wednesday, Oct. 20.

I was dismayed to read Richard Linzey's comments regarding National Historic Site designation for Riverview. In fact, I had to check that he was not representing the Ministry of Housing, which currently seem to be the main spokespersons for the property. I suspect that Mr. Linzey is spouting an official line when he claims that heritage designation is a "very powerful political tool" and something that "prevents change and fossilizes a place." This is a surprising attitude for the manager of heritage programs with the provincial heritage branch.

National Heritage Sites in B.C. include horticultural treasures (Butchart Gardens and Stanley Park), transportation routes (Rogers Pass and Lions Gate Bridge), vibrant urban neighbourhoods (Vancouver's Gastown and Victoria's Chinatown) and revenue-generating structures (the Empress Hotel and the Orpheum and Vogue theatres). I would certainly not label any of these "fossils."

As a National Historic Site, the Riverview lands could continue to provide sanctuary, treatment and research for the mentally ill and addicted. The designation would not rule out revenue-generating activities and there may be federal funds available for maintenance costs. The botanical treasures located there would be enhanced and preserved and the property would likely become a conference centre and tourist destination.

Most importantly, it would ensure that the property remains in public ownership and accessible to all the people of Canada.

Come on, Mr. Campbell. Show some long-term vision and allow the application for heritage designation to proceed. The public deserves to know if the land we own has what it takes to be a National Historic Site.

Sue Haberger

Coquitlam